In all film-savvy groups you will find an individual that dismisses a film simply because it is unrealistic and scientifically bogus(for example "Star Wars sucks because you can't have sound in space"). Besides loving Star Wars I have to admit that I do not really care about the scientific plausibility very much if I do enjoy the movie for any other reason.
NASA and the Science and Entertainment Exchange voted for the most unrealistic/worst sci-fi films as well as the most realistic/science faithful films. It is an interesting list:
Most unrealistic films
- 2012 (2009)
- The Core (2003)
- Armageddon (1998)
- Volcano (1997)
- Chain Reaction (1996)
- The 6th Day (2000)
- What the Bleep Do We Know? (2004)
Most realistic films
- Gattaca (1997)
- Contact (1997)
- Metropolis (1927)
- The Day the Earth Stood Still (1951)
- Woman in the Moon (1929)
- The Thing from Another World (1951)
- Jurassic Park (1993)
3 comments:
I object! Where is 2001 in the most realistic films?
I ll give you that in Odyssey 2001 there is no sound in space. What about that sentient big monolith that sparked intelligence to the human spices though?
Hmm yeah I was a little dissapointed that 2001 didn't make the list. Oh well, at least 2012 got what it deserved!
Post a Comment